June 17, 2005

«Previous Main Next »

On Tsunamis and Other Threats

At 6:50 p.m. on Tuesday, June 14th a magnitude 7.2 earthquake occured in the deep sea 90 miles off the coast of northern California. Shortly thereafter, the West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center issued a Tsunami warning to all residents of coastal California. An hour later, to everyone's relief, the warning was rescinded, as no Tsunami occurred.

Unfortunately, most people knew nothing of the warning until after it was canceled. That's a problem.

On that pleasant summer evening days ago, many people were away from their TVs and radios, and those that heard the few sirens that sounded were simply puzzled. A Tsunami, had one originated so close to the coast, would have innundated many areas witin the hour, before any significant reaction by residents. Despite the ubiquitous distribution of text-message-capable cell phones, there is no coordinated method for distributing a Tsunami warning to individuals in California. In fact, there isn't a way to notifify individuals anywhere in the U.S. of any natural disaster. There are only news media broadcasts and disaster sirens.

A better way to inform the public is through personal alerts delivered by cell phone. Alas, getting the government to instantiate a personal disaster warning system would be a massive undertaking. But there isn't any reason the public can't take matters into its own hands: A grass-roots warning system could be launched just like any other open-source project, and be up and running before the government finished the feasibility study on its own system.

As network administrators, we already have the requisite personal notification mechanisms in place. The network management systems we currently employ to montitor networks have the ability to send pages, make phone calls, and deliver faxes. These systems are battle-tested and generally reliable. They're an excellent way to deliver disaster alerts.

Personal disaster alerts need not reach every individual directly to be effective. If one person in a building gets an alert, he or she can readily notify others nearby, shortening reaction time to the impending disaster. A good model for such a system is the existing NOAA Specific Area Message Encoder (SAME) Emergency Alert System, a radio-based nationwide broadcast system that encodes textual disaster alert messages along with location information to trigger alarms on individual NOAA radio receivers. You can buy these receivers for under $50 and program them to alert you to disasters in your area. An example of such a device is the Midland 74-250C weather radio.

The first step in a personal disaster notification system is marrying NOAA's EAS with our existing NMSs. Once we can receive localized disaster information, we can disseminate it to selected individual cell phones, pagers, and fax machines in realtime. EAS supports two radio notification systems: One using terrestrial FM transmitters, and another using satellite broadcasts. The satellite system, called Emergency Managers Weather Information Network (EMWIN), supports direct-to-computer interfaces. An EMWIN earth station consists of an EMWIN reciever and a three-foot satellite dish antenna. Commercial EMWIN stations cost between $1,000 and $2,000. You can purchase EMWIN hardware and software from Skywalker, Skywatch, Tigertronics, and Zephyrus.

An alternative to an expensive direct radio interface is extracting alerts from NOAA's disaster Web site. Alas, NOAA does not seem to have a single Web point of contact for alert information. Each kind of alert -- earthquake, fire, Tsunami, severe weather, fire -- appears to have its own NOAA page. An experimental XML message service for Tsunamis is at http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/message.shtml. We should lobby NOAA to deliver event messages through a single, well-defined XML-based Web Services interface.

If you know of an existing EMWIN NMS interface, or have ideas on how to construct one, post your ideas here. If enough interest develops, I'll create a Web site dedicated to the grass-roots disaster network concept.

Posted by Mel Beckman at June 17, 2005 10:11 AM

Comments

In the mid-west when there is a tornado warning or watch, a siren goes off for the whole community.

This alerts everyone whether they currently have a radio, TV, or PC on or not.

Also, instructions about what constitutes higher ground in coastal counties would help alleviate a general panic or even passive behavior. What is high enough or far enough away from the coast to be safe?
Also, communities along the coast vulnerable to tsunamies need to have clear cut plans for evacuation and people in communities boarding tsunami vulnerable areas need 'curfew' type rules about not being on the road during a warning..

Also I heard mixed coverage. Some radio and TV stations said only certain coastal areas of Calif where under the warning. Others said the whole coast from Vancouver to Mexican/US Border. And there were no continuous bands of information running across the bottom of the TV on at least the broadcast network TV stations.

Posted by: Karen Knadler at June 21, 2005 11:41 AM

Using the cell phone system during a disaster is probably not going to work very well. Using Southern CA as an example, if NOAA tried to deliver 20 million text messages via cell phone, my guess is that less than a quarter would get through. As an added bonus, the cell system would be so busy handling warnings that it couldn't handle emergency traffic like 911 calls.

I haven't got a good idea for an automated disaster notification service, bt one more thing to think about are the hams in your area. We practise for disasters quite often; many of us have emergency power so that we can continue to operate during power outages, and we don't need any commercial infrastructure (which may be knocked out.)

In fact, hams in the Indian Ocean area were a vital communications link between those islands and the rest of the world. http://www.rsgb.org.uk/news/tsunami.htm and http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/12/28/100/?nc=1

Hams do have an RF packet network established over much of the US and many other parts of the world. Currently it is mostly used for the Automated Packet Reporting System, but anyone can listen in. Perhaps we can float the idea of using packet as an emergency notification service among the ham community?
--buck

Posted by: Buck at June 21, 2005 12:12 PM

I use a program called InterWarn ( http://www.interwarn.com/iwdesc.html )

This functions like a weather radio for your computer. It even on occasion will beat my NOAA Weather Radio when it comes to warnings. There are even some plugins which can upload watch/warning summaries, and a map to a website. It also has email capabilities.

Being from the midwest, I know that I need to keep aware and monitor weather conditions in my area.

Posted by: Ron at June 21, 2005 1:57 PM

These are great comments! I grew up in Minnesota, and there, as throughout the Midwest, the tornado system works very well. The midwest experiences hundreds of tornados every year, providing a lot of motivation for severe storms, but I wonder how well officials would do disseminating other kinds of warnings.

Although cellphone voice channels tend to overload in an emergency, the messaging system is more robust. Because SMS messages are short, and because they require no "call setup" transactions, they can be delivered swiftly. It wasn't always so, but in recent years I've noticed that SMS messages arrive at my cellphone within seconds of being pushed into the SMS system.

I think SMS would work well at the start of an emergency, even if it got bogged down in the later flood of confusing message traffic. NOAH doesn't have to deliver 20 million messages -- only a few thousand need to be delivered in a region to get people reacting and spreading the word.

In the case of a Tsunami, where nothing has happened yet to disrupt communications, I think cellular messaging would be fine.

I'm a ham (KD6WTD) and used to run a packet node in the glory days of the BBS. I am looking into starting up a packet repeater again, and interfacing with ham emergency nets.

After some more research I've learned that there are several commerical outfits that sell (for $30 to $100 per month) cellular paging for NOAA and other alerts. I worry about having all our notification eggs in a few baskets, however, and still think the idea of network administrators providing emergency dissemination has merit.

Posted by: Mel Beckman at June 21, 2005 1:58 PM

OK, here's a great experimental site being provided by NOAA to deliver alerts via RSS:

http://weather.gov/alerts/

Posted by: Mel Beckman at June 21, 2005 2:53 PM

RSS is great, but depending on the reader, it might not be effective in a time sensitive situation. I know that some feed readers take between 5 and 15 minutes to update, and that could mean the difference between life and death.

I'm not trying to be morbid here, just being realistic.

Posted by: Ron at June 23, 2005 7:26 AM